Genealogies of Jesus (The record of Jesus' ancestors)
Matthew 1:1-17 & Luke 3:23b-38
Jesus’ Genealogy as Traced through Joseph
Matthew 1:1–17
1The historical record of Jesus Christ, the Son of David, the Son of Abraham†:
2Abraham fathered Isaac, Isaac fathered Jacob, Jacob fathered Judah and his brothers, 3Judah fathered Perez and Zerah by Tamar, Perez fathered Hezron, Hezron fathered Aram, 4Aram fathered Amminadab, Amminadab fathered Nahshon, Nahshon fathered Salmon, 5Salmon fathered Boaz by Rahab, Boaz fathered Obed by Ruth†, Obed fathered Jesse, 6aand Jesse fathered King David.
6bThen David fathered Solomon by Uriah’s wife, 7Solomon fathered Rehoboam, Rehoboam fathered Abijah, Abijah fathered Asa, 8Asa fathered Jehoshaphat, Jehoshaphat fathered Joram, Joram fathered Uzziah, 9Uzziah fathered Jotham, Jotham fathered Ahaz, Ahaz fathered Hezekiah, 10Hezekiah fathered Manasseh, Manasseh fathered Amon, Amon fathered Josiah, 11and Josiah fathered Jechoniah and his brothers at the time of the exile to Babylon.
12Then after the exile to Babylon Jechoniah fathered Shealtiel, Shealtiel fathered Zerubbabel, 13Zerubbabel fathered Abiud, Abiud fathered Eliakim, Eliakim fathered Azor, 14Azor fathered Zadok, Zadok fathered Achim, Achim fathered Eliud, 15Eliud fathered Eleazar, Eleazar fathered Matthan, Matthan fathered Jacob, 16and Jacob fathered Joseph the husband of Mary, who gave birth to Jesus who is called Messiah.
17So all the generations from Abraham to David were 14 generations; and from David until the exile to Babylon, 14 generations; and from the exile to Babylon until the Messiah, 14 generations.[1]
[1] Knight, G. W. (2001). A simplified harmony of the Gospels (pp. 12–13). Holman Bible Publishers.
Jesus’ Genealogy as Traced through Mary
Luke 3:23–38
23As He began His ministry, Jesus was about 30 years old and was thought to be the son of Joseph, son of Heli,
24son of Matthat, son of Levi, son of Melchi, son of Jannai, son of Joseph,
25son of Mattathias, son of Amos, son of Nahum, son of Esli, son of Naggai,
26son of Maath, son of Mattathias, son of Semein, son of Josech, son of Joda,
27son of Joanan, son of Rhesa, son of Zerubbabel, son of Shealtiel, son of Neri,
28son of Melchi, son of Addi, son of Cosam, son of Elmadam, son of Er,
29son of Joshua, son of Eliezer, son of Jorim, son of Matthat, son of Levi,
30son of Simeon, son of Judah, son of Joseph, son of Jonan, son of Eliakim,
31son of Melea, son of Menna, son of Mattatha, son of Nathan, son of David,
32son of Jesse, son of Obed, son of Boaz, son of Salmon, son of Nahshon,
33son of Amminadab, son of Ram, son of Hezron, son of Perez, son of Judah,
34son of Jacob, son of Isaac, son of Abraham, son of Terah, son of Nahor,
35son of Serug, son of Reu, son of Peleg, son of Eber, son of Shelah,
36son of Cainan, son of Arphaxad, son of Shem, son of Noah, son of Lamech,
37son of Methuselah, son of Enoch, son of Jared, son of Mahalaleel, son of Cainan,
38son of Enos, son of Seth, son of Adam, son of God.[1]
- God is ... What do we learn about God in this passage?
- We are ... What do we learn about people in this passage?
- Who is the historian in your family? What has he/she done to help you know more about your ancestors?
- If you were to explore in more detail the life of one of your ancestors, whose life would you investigate? Why?
- Whose life would you prefer not to know about?
- What is significant about Jesus being baptized at the same time as "all the people"? What three things happen at Jesus' baptism
- I will ... What has the Holy Spirit revealed to us in this passage? How can I apply it to my life this week?
- You can ... Who do you know who needs to hear this? Feel free to share with others by social media links at the bottom of this.
Matthew: A Gospel for Jews
Matthew wrote his Gospel for his own Jewish countrymen to show that Jesus was the Messiah who had been foretold in the Old Testament. This genealogy of Jesus at the very beginning of Matthew has a thoroughly Jewish orientation. Matthew traced Jesus’ family line all the way back to Abraham, the father of the Jewish nation.
Matthew also contains more quotations from the Old Testament than any of the other Gospels. After reporting on an event in the life of Jesus, Matthew often cites an Old Testament passage with this introductory phrase, “So that what was spoken through the prophet … might be fulfilled” (Matt. 8:17). He used this technique to show that Jesus was the Promised One whom the Jewish people had been expecting for several centuries.
God's Timing
Imagine the Savior of the world working in a small-town carpenter's shop until he was thirty years old! It seems incredible that Jesus would have been content to remain in Nazareth all that time, but he patiently trusted the Father's timing for his life and ministry. Priests began their ministry at thirty (Numbers 4:3). Joseph began serving the king of Egypt at thirty (Genesis 41:46), and David was thirty years old when he began to reign over Judah (2 Samuel 5:4). Age thirty, then, was a good time to begin an important task in the Jewish culture. Like Jesus, we need to resist the temptation to jump ahead before receiving the Spirit's direction. Are you waiting and wondering what your next step should be? Don't jump ahead—trust God's timing.
Matthew's genealogy goes back to Abraham and shows that Jesus was related to all Jews. Luke's genealogy goes back to Adam, showing that Jesus is related to all human beings. This is consistent with Luke's picture of Jesus as the Savior of the whole world.
Matthew 1:1-17
Matthew's account of Christ's genealogy reflects several interesting perspectives about the birth of Jesus. Here's one of them: Some form of gennaw (from ginomai) appears 41 times in the text. There are 39 consecutive occurrences of it in 3ps aor.act.ind. form before you get to vs. 16, where with reference to Jesus' birth from Mary, the term switches to passive. The 41st form, a participle, also passive, indicates that the conception was by means of the Spirit. The point: The generations from Abraham to David, from David to the captivity, from the captivity to Joseph all occurred because of direct human activity. Not so, though, with reference to the birth of Jesus. Neither Joseph nor Mary played any active role in that regard. That's to be understood in two ways, both related: first, with reference to the consistency of tense used 39 times in a row and, second, with regard to what that active tense was intended to convey. Though God's providential hand was involved through it all, there was always direct/active human agency and involvement in the generations leading to Christ, and only indirect/passive human involvement in the birth of Christ. The use of gennaw here reflects a definite and unique intentionality re the divine origin of the incarnate Christ. He was begotten of God. [see screen shot of gennaw terms in Mt. 1., from some of the reflections from my IGH260 studies.]
Interesting shift! In the case of the last two verbs, the voice is passive because the one who is begotten is the subject, rather than (as you pointed out with the active verbs) the one who begets. In other words, the passive/active voice shifts the focus from those who do the begetting to the one who is begotten of God.
Notice that Matthew’s purpose is to show that Jesus is legally of David, hence, legally qualified to be the expected Messiah. David is the only one mentioned five times from Matthew 1:1 to Matthew 1:17. (Once, and first, in 1:1; twice in 1:16 where both times he is “David the king,” and twice in 1:17. ) I suggest that this explains the count of 14, 14, 14. That adds to 42 generations from Abraham to Jesus, but only 41 are named. So count David twice! Abraham to David - 14. David to Josiah - 14 (Josias is unnamed in 1:17, but in this list he is the last counted before the carrying away into captivity). Jechonias to Jesus - 14 (Jechonias not named in 1:17 but he is the first in this list counted after the captivity.) So in keeping with the importance of David in Matthew’s purpose, count David twice, and it all adds up!
Matthew 1 gives the legal genealogy of Jesus through Joseph. It notes that Joseph's father was named "Jacob" (same name in the original as "James"). Is it any wonder, then, that the oldest child Joseph fathered was also named "Jacob" ("James," in our English translations)?
No comments:
Post a Comment